The 2023–24 Inversion Scare

Inversion scare — the false alarm · 2023–2024 · latest-revision data

Signal episodes overlapping the window:

Yield curve inversion (10Y–3M)2022-11 → 2025-08critical
Yield curve inversion (10Y–2Y)2022-07 → 2024-09critical
NY Fed recession probability2022-12 → 2026-01critical
Financial stress (STLFSI)2022-03 → 2023-04critical
Bank lending standards2022-09 → …critical
Building permits2022-09 → 2023-09critical
Building permits2024-06 → 2025-10critical
Initial jobless claims2023-04 → 2023-09critical
Initial jobless claims2024-06 → 2024-11warning
Continued claims2022-12 → 2026-01critical
Sahm rule2024-08 → 2025-02critical
Sahm — states2023-06 → …critical
Curve re-steepening2023-10 → 2023-10warning
Curve re-steepening2024-11 → 2025-01warning
Housing starts2023-01 → 2023-06warning
Durable goods orders2024-06 → 2024-09warning
Temporary help employment2023-02 → 2026-07warning
JOLTS labor flows2023-08 → 2024-03warning
Industrial production2023-04 → 2025-02warning
Note: latest-revision data — 'caught' counts an episode overlapping the recession start ±24m (broader than the 12m precision window used in /analytics). Add 'asof' for point-in-time data.

From July 2022 the 2-year/10-year Treasury curve was continuously inverted — eventually passing 624 days to become the longest inversion on record, exceeding the 1978 run. The 10Y–3M probit model's 12-month recession odds peaked near 71% — its highest reading since the early 1980s. Every recession playbook said the downturn was due in 2023. It never came.

Why the signal failed

The inversion's mechanism — inverted curves squeeze bank lending margins, choking credit — was blunted by a deposit glut: banks were paying near-zero on deposits, so margins stayed healthy and credit kept flowing. Meanwhile fiscal stimulus, locked-in low mortgages, and a labor supply shock kept demand resilient. The curve measured rate expectations accurately; it was the transmission channel that broke.

What it teaches

A single-signal monitor would have flashed red for two years straight and been wrong the whole time — the strongest possible argument for a composite panel. Credit spreads stayed calm, NFCI never sustained stress, and labor demand cooled without collapsing. The episode is included here deliberately: a monitor that only publishes its hits is marketing, not methodology.

Fact: The Sahm rule did trigger on the July 2024 data (released in August) — its clearest false-positive-style firing on the modern record — driven by labor-force growth rather than layoffs. Even the 'flawless' signals miss occasionally; that is why the composite asks for corroboration instead of conviction.
Personal alerts in the bot
This page updates when the site rebuilds — the bot messages you the moment a signal fires. Alerts and the weekly digest are free; Plus adds custom thresholds, quiet hours and point-in-time episode replays.
Get alerts in Telegram — @us_recession_chance_bot

Signal episodes · ← back